![]() Sigma has absolutely nothing to do with accuracy. Questoin: Higher Sigma, means tighter shell grouping correct? Stop overdoing yourself and go take a vacation MouseĪlso you forgot Stalingrad with 2.65 sigma Edited Octoby ValkyrWarframeĭoesn't Colorado still have different sigma values for the different hulls even after the HP buff? Or did they standardize it? Here's the sigma for the battleships currently released:Ģ.0 - Imperator Nikolai I, Ishizuchi, Myogiġ.8 - Duke of York, King George V, Gneisenau, Ashitakaġ.8 - Amagi, Roma, Bismarck, Tirpitz, Monarch, Richelieuġ.8 - Friedrich der Große, Izumo, Lion, Musashi Be careful, not all of them are always up to date (though they're usually pretty good). You won't find it anywhere except on some third party sites like those linked above. I feel the Alabama is undervalued because most stay back too far back, and do not utilize her to her full potential, she is a strong ship in her own right.Where do you find the Sigma of each ship listed? Looking to compare the BB lines once I'm done with the USN line. With out the dedicated captain she is not nearly as strong. I know exactly what you are saying and I have both, the review and guide is mainly for captains who only have 1 captain and isn't gonna have time to build a dedicated mass captain. ![]() The mass convinced me to get the Georgia then OHIO, for me all 3 are just better than their tech tree counterparts. I don't have the Alabama but I do have N Carolina/Iowa/Montana. That is true but once you have a 19PT captain the the mass every game will rack up free captain XP and you will have multiple 19PT captains in no time. The Mass is a stronger ship overall but that does not mean anything if you don't like playing it. Watched the video, for someone who loves the N Carolina and traditional higher tier USN BB play the Alabama might be a better pick.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |